Knowing the material, applying it to the work, and catching what slipped through. Most tools gesture at the first and skip the other two. Here is how the three fit together at Chitram.AI, and where to read about each.
What we do not claim
That this settles questions of interpretation. Traditions disagree with each other, regional practice varies, and living communities have a stake that no corpus represents on their behalf. Where the material is contested, the right output is a flag and a recommendation to consult — not a confident answer.
What we do claim is narrower and checkable: that a depiction can be traced to the material behind it, and that the obvious errors get caught while they are still cheap to fix.
Bring us a brief you are unsure about. That is a more useful conversation than a demo, for both of us.